Embarrassed by the theory they espouse, Darwinists are now trying to cover up the idea that “we are descended from apes.”  They are now trying to place Darwin under protection, saying “Darwin never actually said we are descended from apes, but referred to a common ancestor.” Darwinist publications have also adopted this deception and started carrying such ludicrous captions as “apes are our cousins, rather than our ancestors.”  Darwinists started inventing brand new things because of their illogical claims, yet what they invented has just made their degradation even worse.  We are issuing the following call to Darwinists espousing this claim: You are just embarrassing yourselves by saying, “the (imaginary) ancestor of human beings is not an ape, but a common forebear.” Is what you describe not a strange entity closely resembling an ape? And, according to what you claim, does this life form resemble an ape or not? It would appear that it does resemble one. That being the case, what does it matter if it is called an ape or something else? Are you not referring to a wild animal resembling a human being? If it makes you feel better we can called it a “hape” instead. But does calling it a “hape” make your claim any less ridiculous? Give up your demagoguery! This is a totally primitive idea. Declaring an ape-like creature to be a “common ancestor” and saying “we are actually descended from a common ancestor, not from apes” is utterly humiliating.  People refer to this imaginary and odd entity you refer to as an “ape.” This life form resembles a gorilla, a chimpanzee or a primate. But the general term used to describe it is “ape.” There can be no question of ignoring that this is just any word used to describe an entity and saying, “we never said any such thing.” There have been a great many apes resembling human beings. The ape species described as Homo habilis, for instance, exhibits many structural similarities to humans. But this is a complete ape, one covered in fur, that attacks everything around it with its sharp teeth and that eats meat, even members of its own species. In other words, it is an animal. The fact it resembles human beings in some respects does not alter that fact. Man is a totally different entity. Man is an entity possessed of reason and awareness, that sees and perceives images, and that thinks about and makes judgments regarding these; in other words, man IS AN ENTITY WITH A SOUL. In order for something to be “human” it has to be an entity WITH A SOUL capable of saying “I” and aware of its own existence. Even if a soul were bestowed on a cat, that entity would be a human being in the shape of a cat. What makes human beings different from other living things is that they possess a soul. Do not ignore that fact!

Darwinists Use the Same Tactic to Misinterpret Explanations Based on Chance Darwinists; Your tactic of misinterpreting the subject of the imaginary “ape ancestor” is the same as that with which you misinterpret the subject of “chance”! Darwinism is a heretical belief that totally denies Creation, the Creator (surely Allah is beyond that) and thus all the consciousness, reason and design in living things. It therefore ascribes everything random coincidences and aimless, uncontrolled phenomena. Although Darwinism has no other account to offer, and although all Darwinists’ accounts are based on chance and although accounts based on chance appear in all their publications, they still say, “we did not really refer to chance at all.” This is just a bid to refer to chance by another name.  Do not try to change the name of chance in the same way you are trying to alter that of the imaginary “ape ancestor.” Just as you know how you are degrading yourselves when you say “we are descended from apes,” so you are also humiliated when you say, “it happened by chance.” That is why you are trying to give this nonsense a different name and say, “we never spoke of chance.” Asked whether “a conscious entity did this” you say, “No.” Asked whether “all these phenomena are under the control of a mind, an intelligence,” you will again say, “No.” This is a deception. A thing either exists, or it does not. There is either a glass on the table, or there is not. There is no third possibility. You must therefore put an end to your demagoguery. All humanity is amazed at how you are able to belittle yourselves so childishly. There is an important fact that we have reiterated many times before: people can no longer be taken in by Darwinist deceptions. People no longer find it satisfying and convincing when you say, “all right, not an ape, but a common ancestor.” These accounts just confirm a fact we have already shown and described for a long time now: the fact that Darwinists in fact possess nothing other than demagoguery. The more there are of such instances, the better people can see the methods by which Darwinists have deceived them for so many years. People are now much more of the opinion that Darwinism is a fraud. What no remains to be done is therefore to accept this state of affairs and act in the light of the scientific facts. To admit that Darwinism has been defeated and tell people the truth. Like all the other entities on Earth, human beings have been created by our Lord’s will and at His command. What makes human beings human is the soul that Almighty Allah bestows on them. Nothing on Earth or in the universe can act outside the knowledge and decree of Allah. It is therefore impossible for there to be any randomness anywhere in the universe, not even in a single atom. Every entity manifests in itself the power, might and artistry of Allah, the Lord of the Worlds. This is a sublime, matchless and flawless Creation.

In the well-known words of Adolf Hitler, the fascist murder and principal architect of the bloodiest war and slaughter in history;

"If you tell a lie long enough, loud enough and often enough, people will believe it." This quotation from Hitler, a conformed Darwinist, perfectly summarizes the heretical ideology of Darwinism. For 150 years Darwinists have based themselves on this philosophy of Hitler’s and succeeded in convincing people of the greatest deception of history by loudly repeating it over and over again. Even today, when their lies have now been exposed for what they are, Darwinists must imagine that the same tactic can again be successful, since they are still reiterating the lie of evolution with all kinds of fraud. One of the latest instances of this is the deception that “evolution happens faster in warm temperatures,” which has lately been headlined in Darwinist publications.

In the well-known words of Adolf Hitler, the fascist murder and principal architect of the bloodiest war and slaughter in history; "If you tell a lie long enough, loud enough and often enough, people will believe it." This quotation from Hitler, a conformed Darwinist, perfectly summarizes the heretical ideology of Darwinism. For 150 years Darwinists have based themselves on this philosophy of Hitler’s and succeeded in convincing people of the greatest deception of history by loudly repeating it over and over again. Even today, when their lies have now been exposed for what they are, Darwinists must imagine that the same tactic can again be successful, since they are still reiterating the lie of evolution with all kinds of fraud. One of the latest instances of this is the deception that “evolution happens faster in warm temperatures,” which has lately been headlined in Darwinist publications. As we have made clear many times before, Darwinists’ best-known tactic is to behave as if Darwinism were a completely proven theory with merely a few minor details remaining unaccounted for. The lie that evolution accelerates in warm weather is the result of this tactic. These reports say nothing about how IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR EVOLUTION TO TAKE PLACE, HOW IT IS DEVOID OF ANY SUPPORTING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, HOW IT IS UNABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR HOW LIFE BEGAN AND THAT THERE EXISTS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL TO CORROBORATE EVOLUTION. These difficulties that completely repudiate evolution have been set to one side, with the impression being given that so-called evolution’s only problem is hot weather, the intention being to deceive those readers with little information on the subject to the greatest extent possible. This fraud so shamelessly propagated by Darwinists will, of course, be of not benefit to the lie of evolution, which was launched with great fanfare and hoaxes. However, in order to demonstrate the illogicality and the deception in question and how it is rooted in a superstitious ideology, it will be useful to set out the truth regarding this false account from Darwinists: Of course living things’ metabolisms change according to air temperatures. In hot weather, the cellular reactions taking place in the body are speeded up, meaning that metabolism is also accelerated. Darwinist scientists know about this scientific fact, too. What makes them different is that they use this knowledge as a propaganda tool for Darwinist deception. Darwinists maintain that as a result of this reaction increase, the number of mutations that will probably take place inside the cell will also increase and that this will give rise to evolution. This groundless assumption is the very worst deception.  It is true that there is a chance of the DNA in every cell in living things being subjected to mutation as it multiplies and divides. But as the Darwinist publications in question admit, 99% of these mutations are harmful to the DNA. Because mutations are random changes in living things and lead to breakages, deformity and death. No case of mutations bestowing useful characteristics on a living thing has ever been observed or identified. And it is next to impossible for such a thing to happen. Therefore, a rise in the number of mutations in the organism in question as a result of heat will cause further random alterations and the more detailed information about how mutations have no evolutionary effect here.) A second important point that needs to be made clear here is this: even if mutations do produce a harmless alteration in a living thing, this will still be a change taking place within that organism’s existing genetic structure. In other words, a mammal may acquire a third arm or a second tail as a result of these mutations, but it will never acquire a “wing” that did not already exist in its own genome data. There can therefore be no question of the “evolution” claimed by Darwinists, and the claim is a fraudulent one. Darwinists have always used the small changes, variations, that always take place in the genome as tools for speculation. Darwinists call this “microevolution.” But variations have nothing to do with evolution. What Darwinists are using as a propaganda tool is the fact that living things may undergo minute changes in accordance with their habitats. But the fact that Darwinists keep concealed is that LIVING THINGS CAN ONLY CHANGE WITHIN THE INFORMATION EXISTING INSIDE THEIR GENOMES.  In other words, a living thing can only change to the extent permitted by Allah within its genetic data. And every member of the species may exhibit these characteristics since they exist in its genetic data. Fur may change color, beaks may grow longer and bodies may expand. But apart from that, there never will and never has been any change between species of the kind expected by Darwinists. The living thing in question WILL NEVER TURN INTO A DIFFERENT LIFE FORM AND COME TO POSSESS THAT FORM’S FEATURES.  Because it is impossible for a life form to freely develop new structures that do not already exist within its genetic data. (You can access detailed information about how variation has nothing to do with false evolution here.) Therefore, sperm and egg cells dividing more quickly in warm temperatures and the acceleration of metabolism as a result of faster reactions due to heat will not accelerate the variations in question going on in the life form. Heat will only make a living thing better adapted to the circumstances in its habitat, within its own genome. But it will never turn a lizard into a bird. A reptile can never suddenly be covered in fathers, and a mammal can never turn into a bat and fly away. These things are all fantasies. Darwinist fraud is attempted to be propped up by such hollow methods and such irrational and unscientific accounts. But these endeavors by Darwinists just go to show the wretched position in which they find themselves.  Another point that needs to be emphasized here is that as they engage in this speculation, Darwinist are never – EVER – ABLE TO PROVIDE A SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE FOR IT. They are unable to point to a single structure or organ that has changed or evolved in the way they claim. Darwinists presumably imagine that they can maintain the nonsense of evolution using hollow demagoguery alone. The fact is, however, that Darwinism itself and its own hollow techniques have been buried with the revelation of scientific evidence proving the impossibility of evolution and with the revelation of 250 million fossils. Allah has revealed His creation in all its glory. Our advice, therefore, to the Darwinist media that imagine such reports can have any impact and that they can deceive people in this way is that they avoid the embarrassment that accompanies such claims and to keep a closer watch on the increasingly powerful resistance to evolution taking place across the world.

Darwin proposed the concept of natural selection as an “evolutionary mechanism” in the 1800s.

Natural selection is in other words “natural choosing”. The idea of natural selection is based on the idea that powerful life forms well adapted to their natural surroundings will survive. For example, in a herd of zebra menaced by lions, it is those zebra that run fastest that will survive.

Darwinists have once again begun raising claims that have already been answered in order to deny the enormous rout suffered by their dino-bird claims. They have been in a terrible panic, especially in recent days when evolution is going through its death throes, and have set about looking for a series of new methods of deception for the sake of propping Darwinism up. The latest instance of these concern a dinosaur fossil discovered in China and that has recently been reported in certain sections of the press. Darwinists are repeating the same hollow myths and reiterating the error that the fossil in question supposedly represents evidence for evolution.

Statements regarding the invalidity of the claim in question are as follows:

RTBF, the Belgian national TV channel,  broadcast a program containing an interview with Adnan Oktar a few weeks ago.  The point that Adnan Oktar particularly emphasized with irrefutable evidence during this interview, which provided most valuable information on a range of issues, was the Darwinist deception. The provision of information with supporting evidence during the interview in question must have disturbed various Darwinist circles, since an effort was made to include feeble, utterly unscientific and even childish accounts in another part of the program for sake of saving Darwinism’s face. Statements about these deceptive accounts intended to save Darwinism are set out below.   Darwinists’ Illogical Counter-Attacks Have Been Routed in the Face of Fossils Darwinists are unable to provide a single piece of scientific evidence to verify their claims. But whenever a scientific proof that refutes theories is put forward, they imagine they can neutralize the impact of that genuine evidence by launching illogical counter-attacks. This is a kind of defense mechanism unique to Darwinists. Indeed, that is the reason why the Atlas of Creation, which exhibited thousands of pieces of evidence refuting the theory of evolution, together with giant illustrations, provoked such a response from Darwinists. The same method was employed in the statements in question on the RTBF channel. Darwinists are capable of millions of bits of deceptive speculation, but when it comes to fossils that prove Creation, they shamelessly maintain it is impossible to compare these with living specimens.   The fact is, however, that a fossil remain immediately gives paleontologists all kinds of information about that life form. In particular, if the life form in question is one that is still around today, that identification can easily be made. In fact, the similarity between fossils and their living counterparts is so certain that even school children at fossil exhibitions can easily say what a life form it is just by looking at a fossil.

In addition, if Darwinists so choose they can perform the comparison in question between a newly dead organism and a fossil dating back millions of years. There is nothing to stop them. They will again see that there is absolutely no difference between them. The reason why Darwinists engage in sophistry instead of performing such comparisons stems from their fear of what the results will show. But what really needs to be made clear is that a typical Darwinist deception technique is being employed here. Darwinists are capable of promoting a living thing as being a “transitional form” on the basis of a single air sac not being the same as in living members of the same species. They therefore claim that a detail skeletal comparison needs to be carried out between living things. And if a living thing’s little finger is slightly bent, as the result of disease for instance, they have no question about heralding it as the missing link they have been looking for. (Such a claim was recently made regarding the perfect lemur fossil Ida, but the dimension of the speculation embarrassed even Darwinist scientists, who described it as “ridiculous.”) That is the Darwinist intention behind detailed comparisons. If Darwinists want to produce a transitional form, the fossils they produce must be of these kinds:  

As with all aspects of evolutionary nonsense, we have for a long time been describing the same scientific facts whenever the myth of birds evolving from dinosaurs has been raised:

We have described, many times and with definitive supporting evidence, how all these things TOTALLY REFUTE THE DARWINIST MYTH OF A TRANSITION FROM LAND TO AIR. Darwinists now admit the invalidity of this impossible scenario.

Darwinists have concluded from the way orang utans produce the sound of laughter that these are the ancestors of human beings.

Let us not provide other evidence, although this evidence may well depress Darwinists even further: If Darwinists are looking for similarities, orang utans’ teeth also resemble those of human beings. They also have two eyes and a nose in the front of their heads, just like human beings! They also have two ears and two arms. They eat and move. Just like human beings, they drink water and clean themselves. They have fingernails, just like human beings, and their hands resemble ours. And even more than all this, THEY ALSO MAKE LAUGHING SOUNDS.

Darwinism, communism, materialism, violence and terror are all inseparable parts of a single whole. Since Darwinism regards human beings as aimless animals, it leads people who adopt this perspective in the direction of rebellion, conflict, anarchy, lovelessness, selfishness and immorality.

Darwin Was a Racist Who Espoused the Elimination of Races He Regarded As Inferior

RACISM, WHICH EQUATES AFRICANS WITH "APES" This drawing reflects the theory of Social Darwinism which developed in the 19th century. The branches of the tree contain a chimpanzee, a gorilla, an orangutang and an African. This villainous hatred of black-skinned people was one of the founding principles of Nazism.