Darwinist Frauds

The invalidity of the claim that “moral understanding exists from birth, you cannot ignore an actively existing concept”

Some Darwinists maintain that moral understanding is a pre-existing concept in living things, that they possess it from birth, and that there is therefore no need for belief in Allah in order to be ethical (surely Allah is beyond that). As proof of this, they cite examples of self-sacrifice in various living things. But the fact is they are gravely …

Read More »

The invalidity of the claim that “evolution has nothing to do with chance”

One of the issues that Darwinists have recently taken to espousing is the claim that “evolution has nothing to do with chance.” This claim, proposed with the incomprehensible and specious idea that “everything happened randomly, but that does not mean by chance,” serves no other purpose than to reveal how illogical Darwinists’ claims are. This claim, developed as a defense …

Read More »

A response to the claim that “nobody objects to scientific theories, only to evolution”

Darwinists maintain that nobody ever questions quantum theory or Einstein’s claims, and that the only objections in the world are to evolution. By saying that, the Darwinists in question are trying to persist in their policy of depicting Darwin and evolution as a supposedly wronged and innocent victim. The Darwinists in question are in fact well aware of the reason …

Read More »

A response to the claim that “If students do not learn about evolution they can never learn about the diversity in nature”

The idea that “If students do not learn about evolution they can never learn about the diversity in nature” is part of the mass hypnosis that Darwinists are trying to perpetrate. Darwinists spread the deceptive idea that someone who is ignorant of evolution can never know about the diversity in nature in order to spread the fraud that “evolution is …

Read More »