The Transitional Forms Deceit

The invalidity of the claim that “the fossils known as transitional forms have been retracted because better ones have been found”

Darwinists admit that the fossils portrayed supposed transitional forms are eventually taken back and removed from the literature, but they justify this by claiming that “a better one has been found.”  The fossils brought to public view to great Darwinist fanfare in the last few years in particular show how comic this evolutionist claim really is . –      The evolution deception …

Read More »

The invalidity of the claim that “the fact that species may change little or not at all does not disprove evolution”

This is what Darwinists say when faced with fossil evidence that has never undergone any change. Such glorious fossil evidence so demolished evolution that Darwinists think they can remedy the situation and close the subject by claiming that some species have never changed.  The fact is, however, that this applies to all the more than 300 million fossils that have …

Read More »

Why is National Geographic magazine so unhappy at the exposure of Ardi?

The Turkish edition of National Geographic magazine devoted its July 2010 issue to Ardi, one of Darwinists’ great disappointments. Although the whole world now knows that Ardi is a fraud National Geographic’s endeavors on behalf of evolution have of course led to various points regarding that fraud to be raised once again: In all likelihood, National Geographic is sharing Darwinists’ …

Read More »

How was Tiktaalik roseae turned into a false intermediate fossil by Darwinists?

Many aspects of the Darwinist deception regarding Tiktaalik Roseae, for long years the subject of speculation by Darwinists, have been exposed. Darwinist fraud, which we have maintained on the agenda so many times, has once again been revealed with new aspects. It has again been seen that people are being misled by Darwinists; TIKTAALIK ROSEAE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A …

Read More »