|
| The invalidity of the claim that ""transitional forms do not mean deformed living things"" |
|
The invalidity of the claim that “transitional forms do not mean deformed living things” |
| The invalidity of the claim that ""the fossils known as transitional forms have been retracted because better ones have been found"" |
|
The invalidity of the claim that “the fossils known as transitional forms have been retracted because better ones have been found” |
| The invalidity of the famous Darwinist claim that ""useful mutations do exist."" |
|
The invalidity of the famous Darwinist claim that “useful mutations do exist.” |
| The invalidity of he claim that ""the probability calculations regarding protein formation are wrong"" |
|
The invalidity of he claim that “the probability calculations regarding protein formation are wrong” |
| The invalidity of the claim that ""RNA is the forebear of life"" |
|
The invalidity of the claim that “RNA is the forebear of life” |
| The invalidity of the claim that ""moral understanding exists from birth, you cannot ignore an actively existing concept"" |
|
The invalidity of the claim that “moral understanding exists from birth, you cannot ignore an actively existing concept” |
| The invalidity of the claim that ""evolution has nothing to do with chance"" |
|
The invalidity of the claim that “evolution has nothing to do with chance” |
| The invalidity of the claim that ""the fact that species may change little or not at all does not disprove evolution"" |
|
This is what Darwinists say when faced with fossil evidence that has never undergone any change. Such glorious fossil evidence so demolished evolution that Darwinists think they can remedy the situation and close the subject by claiming that some species have never changed. |
| Responses to the claim that peptide bonds can be established in the laboratory |
|
Responses to the claim that peptide bonds can be established in the laboratory |
| A response to the claim that ""nobody objects to scientific theories, only to evolution"" |
|
A response to the claim that ”nobody objects to scientific theories, only to evolution” |
|
|
1
2 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
|
|
THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE
The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>
 |
In order to create, God has no need to design
It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth.
When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)
|
|
