Türkçe


Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines



Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 


Darwinists Should Produce Proof of Evolution Rather Than Engaging in Demagoguery
Since they lack any scientific evidence, Darwinists have no other method than demagoguery they can use. For whole, long paragraphs they use strange and incomprehensible words that not even they themselves understand, and imagine that they can thus influence their readers. Darwinists, who think that these statements, commonly known as “verbosity,” are enough to convince people of the rightness of their case, imagine that old techniques are still valid today. The fact is, however, that these demagogic statements devoid of any evidence convince nobody, anywhere.
Richard Dawkins Is Wising Up!
University of Oxford zoologist Richard Dawkins, who is known to be Darwin’s Rottweiler, has long been striving to sustain a theory which is exposed to a universal destruction and is finally wising up! In all his recent articles, conversations and interviews, Dawkins has begun to voice a single truth: that life on Earth cannot have formed by chance!
Yakup Kepenek’s Evolutionary Errors
The 30 June, 2008, issue of the Turkish daily Cumhuriyet carried an article by one of the paper’s writers, the economist Yakup Kepenek. In his article, titled “Origin,” Kepenek noted that 1 July, 2008, was the 150th anniversary of the day Charles Darwin first announced his discovery of what he referred to as the law of evolution, and heaped praise on the theory and Darwin himself. The errors in Kepenek’s article, which are clearly ideological in origin, are refuted below.
Platypus Genome Analysis and Evolutionists’ Distortions
In its 8 May, 2008, Nature magazine carried a report titled “Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution.” The report stated that scientists have deciphered the genetic code of the platypus, which has various mammal, bird and reptile characteristics. “It is hoped that genetic analysis of the platypus will help explain how mammals, including human beings, in some way evolved millions of years in the past,” it said.
Abram Katz"s Fantastical Claims
An article in the American daily New Haven Register, written by Abram Katz and containing various comments regarding subjects included in Harun Yahya’s Atlas of Creation, contained both inaccurate information and unscientific interpretations.
Futuyma"s Bosphorus Errors
A conference was recently held at the Bosphorus University (BU) in Istanbul, following another held at the Middle East Technical University (METU), Turkey, to which the State University of New York"s evolutionary biologist Douglas J. Futuyma was invited as a guest of the METU Biology Department teaching staff member Aykut Kence. Futuyma divided his conference address, entitled "Evolution: The Most Important Theory in Biology," into two parts, the first concerning supposed evidence for evolution and the second, a claim that creationism is not scientific. The conference, held at 17:00 hours on 11 May 2006, in the Assembly Hall, was attended by academics including Professor Asl? Tolun, head of the BU Molecular Biology and Genetics Department, and Dr. Aykut Kence, as well as some 100 students. Below, we provide a general critique of Futuyma"s address, followed by individual responses to his misleading comments regarding the theory of evolution.
There is a better question for New Scientist to ask!
On 11 March 2006, the New Scientist magazine website carried an article titled ?Are we still evolving?? The article, written by Kate Douglas, contained speculation regarding whether or not the evolutionary process, which evolutionist researchers have adopted as a dogma, is still continuing. After quoting Steven Pinker from Harvard University as saying, ?In the biological sense of changes in the gene pool, it"s impossible to say,? Douglas referred to work by Bruce Lahn, considering this as a finding suggesting that supposed evolution is still taking place.
Nonsense About ""Evolution Teaching Man"" On Ntvmsnbc.com
Evolutionary propaganda is an attempt to disseminate an unscientific and irrational belief under a scientific guise and using various misleading means. One of these deceptive methods employed by evolutionists is personification, or ascribing human attributes to non-human entities.
Evolutionary Distortions From CBT
The Turkish magazine Cumhuriyet Bilim Teknik (Cumhuriyet Science and Technology) carried a report titled ?The 10 Most Important Scientific Events? in its 7 January, 2006, edition. The article listed the advances described as the most important scientific developments of the year by the American magazine Science. The CBT sub-caption read ?Important findings have been obtained regarding the way that populations diverge in order to establish new species,? and the section regarding the theory of evolution appeared under the heading ?Evolutionary mechanism discovered.?
Dogmatic Backing for Micro-Evolution
In its 15 January 2004 edition Nature magazine carried an article titled ?Evolutionary biology: Our relative genetics.? Written by David Penny, an evolutionary biologist working at New Zealand?s Massey University, the article asks whether or not micro-evolutionary genetic changes can account for the origin of man. Penny considers this question with interpretations based on data from the still uncompleted chimpanzee genome project.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.