Türkçe


Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines



Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 

107 / 2007-06-26
Türkçe

Fossils unearthed from a cave in the south of China have revealed that the panda is also a "living fossil." To put it another way, the fossil record shows that these creatures have remained as pandas since their first appearance millions of years ago.

 

Details of the discovery were published in the journal PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) by the American National Academy of Sciences.[i] The research team included the Iowa University anthropologist Russell Ciochon and the researchers Changzhu Jin and Jinyi Liu from the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

 

According to the PNAS paper, the fossil panda, given the scientific name Ailuropoda microta, was smaller than the giant pandas living in mountainous regions of China today. The giant panda measures up to 1.5 meters, while the fossil panda, known as the dwarf panda measures less than 1 meter. This shows that pandas of different sizes have existed, in the same way that there are different sized horses.


However, the fossil discovery in question is of crucial importance in terms of the origins of the panda, since it is the oldest found to date. In addition, the fact that the remains of the A. microta skull have been largely preserved has enabled researchers to provide a comprehensive description of the animal. Investigations revealed that these oldest panda remains have no characteristics beyond the standard panda anatomy. The age of the remains and their relatively well preserved state have therefore provided information confirming the panda"s previously attested
[ii] status as a living fossil. 

A report prepared by the Iowa University News Center and published on Eurekalert, the news organ of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, contained statements showing that the panda is indeed a living fossil:

"The new find, made about 18 months ago in a south China karst (limestone) cave by Chinese researchers and co-authors Changzhu Jin and Jinyi Liu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, shows that the basic anatomy of the giant panda has remained largely unchanged for millions of years."[iii]

Evolutionist disappointment: the oldest known panda was also herbivorous

The A. microta remains have dealt a severe blow to the theory of evolution by revealing how the animal has remained unchanged for millions of years. Another significant effect of the findings in terms of confounding evolutionist hypotheses concerns the panda"s feeding habits. 

According to the evolutionist scenario, herbivorous pandas that feed on bamboo stalks are assumed to have evolved from carnivorous forebears. The reason for this is the panda"s wide jaws, teeth and powerful claws. Evolutionists claim that the supposed ancestors of the panda used these features against other animals. The fact is, however, that the panda"s only enemy is man. They have no enemies in the animal kingdom and the reason for their powerful teeth and jaws is to enable them to tear off and chew bamboo stalks with ease. Their strong claws are for climbing up bamboo trunks. There is no evidence that pandas, which generally feed on bamboo, and fruit and plants from time to time, evolved from carnivorous forebears. This claim is based on the prejudiced and mistaken idea that, according to the theory of evolution, all living things are descended from a common ancestor, for which reason the diversity among living things must have evolved subsequently.

The latest A. microta discovery has made this evolutionist claim even more groundless than ever. Because the features of the A. microta skull and teeth reveal that like its present-day counterparts, the oldest known pandas were herbivorous. Ciochon says this on the subject:

"Pandas are very unique bears – the only bear species that is known to exist on a wholly vegetarian diet … Our new discovery shows the great time depth of this unique bamboo-eating specialization in pandas. Thus pandas have been "uniquely pandas" for many millions of years."[iv]

As we have seen, the supposed evolution of bamboo-eating is based solely on a deception, and the fact that pandas" mode of feeding has never changed has been definitively established.

The panda"s unique habit of feeding on bamboo reveals a complete lack of evolution, rather than evolution as suggested in this article. It is not only the animal"s mode of feeding but also its general anatomy that remained unchanged. The objective approach to this would be to accept that pandas have always been pandas, ever since the moment they first appeared, in other words that they were created


 

 

[i] Changzhu Jin, Russell L. Ciochon, Wei Dong, Robert M. Hunt, Jr, Jinyi Liu, Marc Jaeger, and Qizhi Zhu, "The first skull of the earliest giant panda," PNAS, June 26, 2007, Vol. 104, no. 26 pp.10932-10937

[ii] Panda Granny, 12 Haziran 2007, http://www.abc.net.au/tv/btn/stories/s1947589.htm

[iii] UI anthropologist, "Colleagues discover remains of earliest giant panda," July 18, 2007, http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-06/uoi-uac061507.php

[iv] UI anthropologist, "Colleagues discover remains of earliest giant panda," July 18, 2007, http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-06/uoi-uac061507.php



The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.