Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines

Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

67 / 2006-01-01

A response was issued by us when Homo floresiensis, to give it its scientific name, or Hobbit, as it was widely referred to in the media, fossils were first discovered (1). In that response we explained how the classification of Homo floresiensis as a separate species was based solely on evolutionist preconceptions, and that there were no concrete scientific criteria on which everyone agreed. The groundless nature of this “separate species” claim subsequently came to the surface, and we reported how experts from various countries of the world had, in their published reports, added their weight to the ideas that a small brain volume was insufficient grounds for Homo floresiensis to be classified as a separate species, and that the approximately 400 cc volume skull concerned could have been the result of the disease known as microcephaly, which leads to a non-fully developed brain. (2, 3)

Comparisons between microcephalic skulls belonging to Homo sapiens, or modern man, and the Homo floresiensis skull revealed very obvious similarities, and the reason for the wish to regard Flores Man as a separate species thus became more apparent: blind evolutionist belief that more than one human species must once have existed.

The program Horizon, aired on BBC Two on 22 September, 2005, introduced its audience to two more scientists who supported the microcephaly thesis with regard to Flores Man (1); Professor Bob Martin and Ann MacLarnon from Roehampton University. The researchers, who maintained that Homo floresiensis was subject to the disease microcephaly in the same way as modern human beings, supported their views with various medical findings.

Professor Martin calculated how much brain volume shrank in the event of a mammal’s physical dimensions being reduced in size. Martin based these calculations on a principle he described in these terms:
"What this law says in simple terms is that if you halve body size, brain size is only reduced by 15%… So if you halve body size you don"t halve brain size, the brain is reduced far less than that."

He took figures for Homo erectus, to whom an ancestral role is ascribed in the claim that Flores Man is a separate species, as his basis. For this he calculated how much a Homo erectus individual 1.75 m tall and with a 990 cc brain volume could have shrunk in size. As a result he determined that 750 cc corresponded to the 1 m height of Flores Man. This, however, was far greater than the actual figure of 400 cc.

The meaning of this was that the reasons for the shrinking in the brain were not limited to a reduction in the size of the body. This strengthened the thesis that other factors, such as microcephaly, must have been involved.

In a separate study, Ann MacLarnon from Roehampton University found a microcephalic skull in the vaults of the Royal College of Surgeons in London that totally matched the dimensions of the Flores Man brain. MacLarnon explained the significance of this by saying:

“It showed that we really could demonstrate with a specimen that [microcephaly] could explain the Hobbit"s small brain.”


As we have seen, the scenario that Flores Man was a separate species is gradually disappearing in the face of the accumulation of scientific findings that oppose this. This represents a repetition of a familiar fact regarding the myth of human evolution: the species that evolutionists propose as living things between man and ape are eventually classified, in the face of the scientific evidence, into either fully human or fully ape categories, thus forcing evolutionists to remove them from the imaginary human family tree. The microcephaly thesis, further strengthened by the findings presented on the BBC Horizon program, shows that Flores Man was the result of the same process.

The human family tree consists of unscientific nonsense made up by evolutionists. They seek to keep it alive as a representation of the evolutionist world view. Yet these fossils, very few in number and widely scattered, actually provide no support for evolutionist scenarios. Neither man nor apes are random forms that evolved by chance. Both are perfect beings created by God with His infinite might and knowledge.

Reference:1- www.bbc.co.uk, “New "Hobbit" disease link claim,” 23 September 2005

The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.