Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

65 / 2005-11-22

The 22 November, 2005, edition of The New York Times carried a report headed “In  Give and Take of Evolution, a Surprising Contribution from Islands.” The subject matter of the article in question, written by the scientific writer Carl Zimmer, was a genetic sequencing analysis performed by American Museum of Natural History biologists.

Scientists Christopher E. Filardi and Robert Moyle examined DNA samples from monarch flycatchers, from the family Dicruridae, that live on the Pacific islands, and used the data they obtained to produce an imaginary evolutionary history of these birds. The scientists went on to claim that these birds evolved from a common ancestor that lived in Australia or New Guinea between 2 and 5.6 million years ago, and that the Pacific islands served as a factor that accelerated the emergence of new species during this evolutionary process.

Based on the results of the study, Zimmer wrote that “Animals can spread from island to island, giving rise to an explosion of new species, and even colonizing the mainland again,” claiming that not just movements from the mainland to the islands, but also movements from island to island and even from the islands to the mainland may have played a significant role in the imaginary process of evolution taking place on the islands.

However, the study in question actually reveals no scientific finding to the effect that the bird family Dicruridae emerged as the result of evolution, and the evolutionists have simply interpreted the data they obtained in the light of their own preconceptions. According to this perspective, which regards similarities as the consequence of evolution, they develop imaginary scenarios as to how and when the birds might have evolved.

In addition, the idea of “speciation” on the islands is again a description based on evolutionists’ own preconceptions. Evolutionists overstate variations within bird species in the light of their own prejudices and maintain that variations all represent distinct species. The research into the famous Galapagos finches, based on 30 years of observation, shows how they are mistaken on this subject. These studies revealed that the variations interpreted as “evidence of speciation” by evolutionists in fact exhibit no unrestricted change and that the change observed in the finches’ beaks reversed in such a way as to return to the former beak type.

Not just this, but also the general question of the origin of birds represents a major problem for the theory of evolution. The examples of speciation assumed by Zimmer in his article represent no solution to this. Should you wish, you can obtain more information about the structures unique to birds and the dilemma they pose for the theory of evolution from this link.


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.