Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

35 / 2004-03-26

In its 26 March 2004 edition the Turkish daily Radikal carried an article titled “Man, A Genetic Error!” The article concerned a new evolutionist claim put forward by University of Pennsylvania’s Hansell Stedman and his team. The caption to the article read: “The contribution of a ‘genetic error’ to the development of mankind: The jaw shrank and made room for the brain when a gene was subjected to mutation 2.4 million years ago.” According to the Radikal account, it was this mutation that lay behind human beings’ having such a large brain volume.

However, the claims made in the report consist entirely of speculation based on evolutionist prejudice. The researchers, who had signed up to evolution right from the outset, identified a difference between the nucleotide sequences in the gene that encodes the protein myosin, produced in the muscles of the human jaw, and the gene which encodes the same protein in apes, and treated this difference as a mutation. Evolutionists reject right from the outset the possibility that the nucleotide sequences in apes and human beings could have been separately designed. Neither is that the only assumption underlying the claims in question. After assuming a mutation, the researchers then assume that the jaw muscles are a factor restricting brain volume. Furthermore, that assumption has been the subject of an unequivocal objection, which is ignored in Radikal. In a news commentary written by Elizabeth Pennisi and published in Science magazine, the Columbia University physical anthropologist Ralph Holloway objects to the claims made by Stedman and his team in the words, “To suggest that the brain is constrained by chewing muscles is just rubbish.” 1

An article published by the British scientific magazine Nature news service, which carried the research article, states, “The theory is by no means proven.2 ” However, here too Radikal demonstrates the same scrupulousness as it does in its selection of interpretations which favour evolutionist speculation, and ignores this statement published by the magazine’s news service, the direct source of the report. At the basis of this lies a policy of seeking to portray the theory of evolution as a very solid one.

The assumption that an organ as complex as the brain evolved through random mutation and natural selection, an assumption requiring unlimited powers of imagination, is immediately submitted as a scientific theory, and no space at all is devoted to comments that oppose the theory. Readers are thus deprived of the right to use their critical faculties and are forced to dogmatically accept a claim based totally on imagination. We invite the Radikal management to review the daily’s scientific news service activities accordingly.

Note: This article also constitutes our response to a short report in the 26 March 2004 edition of daily Posta called “Our Jaw Is the Architect of Intelligence!”.

Related article: Evolutionary Tell Tales – 5 - BBC’s Evolution of the Human Brain Error




1. Elizabeth Pennisi, “The Primate Bite: Brawn Versus Brain?” Science, vol. 303, Issue 5666, 1957, 26 March 2004
2. Michael Hopkin, “Jaw-Dropping Theory of Human Evolution,” Nature Science Update, 25 March 2004,


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.