Türkçe


Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines



Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 

67 / -0001-11-30

One principle component in the propaganda of the fairy tale that species evolved from one another is the fossil species considered within an ancestor-descendant relationship. These relationships may assume concrete form in diagrams in which different species are located on the branches of a family tree, or in the words of a scientist interpreting the skulls laid out in a row on his/her desk. As fossils are interpreted within the scope of evolutionary lines of descent by these means, most people get the impression that such accounts represent scientific data obtained from fossils. The fact is that such an impression is totally deceptive. The relationship in question exists solely in the minds of evolutionists and is based on no scientific data whatsoever.

One authority to express this openly is Colin Patterson, senior palaeontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London. In an interview, Patterson said that the series that people liked to describe as if they really existed were in fact fictitious. Patterson went on to say:

If you ask, "What is the evidence for continuity?" you would have to say, "There isn"t any in the fossils of animals and man. The connection between them is in the mind." 1

In fact, fossils always represent not an ancestor-descent relationship, but rather isolated points in a particular period in history. The concepts of the "the ancestor of man," (or the ancestor of any other species) and the "missing link," used as another vehicle for evolutionist propaganda, are terms based on no scientific data at all, and are "man-made inventions" produced in the light of scenarios in people"s minds.

Henry Gee, an evolutionist palaeontologist and editor of the journal Nature, is someone who has effectively unveiled the unscientific aspects of the ancestor-descendant account still widely maintained by many of his professional colleagues. In his book In Search of Deep Time, Gee writes:

New fossil discoveries are fitted into this preexisting story. We call these new discoveries "missing links", as if the chain of ancestry and descent were a real object for our contemplation, and not what it really is: a completely human invention created after the fact, shaped to accord with human prejudices. In reality, the physical record of human evolution is more modest. Each fossil represents an isolated point, with no knowable connection to any other given fossil, and all float around in an overwhelming sea of gaps… To recall what I said in chapter 1, no fossil is buried with its birth certificate. That, and the scarcity of fossils, means that it is effectively impossible to link fossils into chains of cause and effect in any valid way, whether we are talking about the extinction of the dinosaurs, or chains of ancestry and descent. Everything we think we know about the causal relations of events in Deep Time has been invented by us, after the fact. 2

Most of us will have seen in TV documentaries a number of fossils laid out side by side and being interpreted within imaginary chains of ancestor and descendant by a scientist. Gee has stated that such interpretations are of no scientific worth, and consist merely of a "bedtime story" adapted to prejudices:

From our vantage point in the present, we arrange fossils in an order that reflects gradual acquisition of what we see in ourselves. We do not seek the truth, we create it after the fact, to suit our own prejudices… To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story- amusing, perhaps even instructive, but not scientific. 3

In short, when one encounters a fossil it is impossible to be certain that it is your ancestor or that of anything else, even that of another fossil.4 For that reason, the evolutionary ancestor-descendant propaganda disseminated all over the world by written and visual evolutionist media must be taken as fairy tales devoid of any scientific foundation, and it must be realised that they are of no more value than a tale constructing a line of descent between the frog and human beings.

 

 

1) L.D. Sunderland, Darwin"s Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems, Master Book Publishers: El Cajon CA, revised edition, 1988, p. 90, emphasis added
2) Henry Gee, In Search of Deep Time: Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life, The Free Press, A Division for Simon & Schuster, Inc. , 1999, pp. 32, 113, emphasis added
3) Ibid, pp. 114, 117
4) Ibid, p. 127



The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.