Türkçe


Evolutionary Propaganda in Daily Papers

Evolutionary Propaganda in Scientific Magazines

Evolutionary TV broadcasts

Evolutionary Propaganda on the Internet

Common Darwinist Claims

Evolutionary Propaganda in Other Magazines



Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Presentations on the fact of creation



The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
 

34 / 2003-04-12

In the Ediacara region of South Australia referred to, a larIn its April 12 2003 issue, the magazine New Scientist published an article headlined: “Ice Magic.” In the article, one of the matters which is amongst the greatest problems of the theory of evolution is considered and speculation is set forth about the so-called evolutionary origins of multicellular organisms. However, this speculation does not touch on the difference between single cell and multicellular organisms and does not even provide an answer as to how the transfer from one to the other could have been effected. It is claimed only that the supposed “snowball earth” period when the world was covered with ice to a depth of one meter might have played a part in this so-called evolution. The article also refers to the Ediacara fauna which date back 600 million years and claims that fossils found in Ediacara demonstrate the emergence of multicellular creatures through evolution.ge number and variety of fossils of invertebrates from the Pre-Cambrian period have been obtained. As there are a very small number of multi-celled fossils from preceding periods, the Ediacara fauna are very important.

In the article in New Scientist, it is explained that the snowball earth period from 750 to 590 million years ago is regarded as a series of ice ages, each of which lasted 10 million years and it is stated that these were followed by intense heating. New Scientist claims that multi-celled creatures in regions such as Ediacara evolved from single cell creatures in connection with the extreme temperature differences which occurred during this period.

However, the speculations in New Scientist are both unproven and fail to provide a single answer to the question of how single cell creatures came into being and were able to turn into multicellular ones. New Scientist merely relates a fable about how such vital functions of single-celled organisms as feeding, digestion, excretion and reproduction came to be shared some time later by multiple cells without providing any proof whatsoever.

In a multicellular organism, the cells demonstrate integration and independence to differing degrees. The development of multicellular organisms is brought about by cellular separation and division of functions. Cells become productive in a single function and are dependent on other cells for the necessities of life.

For example, if the human body has emerged from a single cell, it possesses more than 200 different tissue types and the cells in each of these perform different functions.

Multicellular organisms are developed organisms whose cells possess a special communications system united within a special cellular network. Multicellular organisms have a special design based not on a numerical majority but on functionality and complexity at a high level.

In the operation of all these functions, a common consciousness is observable. It is blatantly obvious that the cells could not have come together in such a system by accident. The origin of multicellular organisms can only be explained by conscious design, that is by the Creation.

In fact there is no intermediate form between single cell and multicellular organisms. In the world of living creatures, there are only single cell organisms and multi-celled organisms which live through the operation in an organized and specialized fashion of thousands, tens of thousands, of cells. It has not been observed that two, three, four or five cells have come together to form a living organism. Just as there is no such life form in the living world, neither is there any in fossil records. Nor is there any logic in single cell organisms, which according to Darwinism have to live “for their own selfish existences”, coming together to create a new organism.

In short, the origin of multicellular creatures is in complete darkness as far as the theory of evolution is concerned. An escape from this darkness is not possible by means of speculating about the world’s climatic conditions.

We recommend New Scientist to accept that it is not possible to explain the differences between single cell and multi-celled creatures through evolution and to abandon scenarios based on imaginative speculation.



The Lie of Human Evolution

Darwinist Propaganda, Darwinist Demagoguery

The Dilemma of Transitional Forms

The Origin of Living Things

Dead End for Molecular Evolution

Creation of the Universe

Lies of Atheism, Materialism and the Philosophy of Evolution

The Deception of Animal Evolution

The Deception of Plant Evolution

Darwinist Fairy Tales on Life

Articles on Darwinist Deception

The Deficient Basis of The Darwinist Propaganda

How the Dajjal died


THE ATLAS OF CREATION RAZED DARWINISM IN EUROPE

The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>


In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.