Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

102 / 2003-05-02

On the 2nd of May the Animal Planet channel aired a documentary called "THE FUTURE IS WILD." It was about animals, which would supposedly ‘evolve’ over the next two hundred million years. Computer generated images of weird looking animals were accompanied by an even weirder storyline: A species of fish called ‘flish’ would appear. These fish that have the ability to fly, would eat all the other fish, and cause their extinction.

Another strange creature called ‘crypile’ was introduced in the documentary. It resembled lizards and, according to the storyline, it would feed on flies on the salt deserts, which were to form by the evaporation of the Mediterranean Sea over many millions of years. Its hunting technique was interesting too: flies would be trapped on the sticky surface of the fan like ‘collar’ around its neck and then retrieved by its tongue, almost the length of its entire body. More weird creatures were described in the documentary, but every single one of them was just the fruit of a vivid imagination. Never minds science fiction, this documentary was just plain fiction.

Before formulating an adequate response to this documentary, it must be stated that the evolution theory has been invalidated by the findings of modern science many times over. The evolutionists cannot even explain how a single cell could have formed by itself. The so-called missing links are still ‘missing’, despite their ceaseless search for them in the fossil records for over 150 years and, best of all, the sciences of biochemistry and genetics reject evolution categorically.

Furthermore, when we look at natural history, we find that contrary to the claims of species evolving by developing different anatomical features by the Animal Planet documentary, animals preserve the same body form over hundreds of millions of years. Scientists call this reality, observable in every species of animal, ‘stases’. For instance, the 400 million years old fossil of a Coelacanth is no different to the Coelacanths of today. Likewise, hundreds of millions of year’s old fossils of crustaceans, worms, beetles, amphibians, turtles or birds, are still the same animals as the living representatives of those species. This reality was acknowledged by the renowned paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould of Harvard University:

Most species exhibit no directional change during their tenure on earth. They appear in the fossil record looking much the same as when they disappear; morphological change is usually limited and directionless.

This being so, there is no scientific cause for us to think that animals, 200 million years hence, will be any different to today’s.

These unscientific assertions by the Animal Planet’s documentary are based on the book titled The Future is Wild. The authors of this book are fanatical evolutionists who simply disregard all the scientific evidence disproving evolution and continue to defend this unscientific theory. It is obvious that the weird creatures in the documentary had not come about by scientific research. They are simply the creation of the Darwinist propaganda.

Animal Planet could not stop itself from calling the narrators ‘experts’ all the time, but what for? Even if the narrator of a fictitious story was not a layman but a so-called expert, imagination remains imagination.

In short, the Animal Planet channel was not concerned about airing a tragicomic fictitious story, playing its part in the evolution propaganda. We call on the channel to be more realistic and discerning about their programming. 


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.