Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

102 / 2003-05-10

In this documentary about ungulates, this story is told about the origin of these creatures:

"65 million years ago, when dinosaurs disappeared, the first ancestors of ungulates appeared. These condylarths disappeared generations ago and, today"s ungulates, they used to walk on their toenails. Today"s ungulates are evolved from condylarths. 50 million years ago, ungulates divided into two kinds, single and cloven."

Here Animal Planet has ignored the scientific literature to retell a legend. Indeed, these claims are based on a few series of fossils in which some similarity has been established. But it is known that these series are invalid and that no relationship has been found between condylarths and hoofed animals. There is no connection between the single supposed ancestors of the horse.

(Hyracotherium or Eohippus) and condylarths supposed to be in the same ancestral grouping.
(Kofahl, R.E., Handy Dandy Evolution Refuter, Beta Books, San Diego, California, p. 159)

Like the claim that hoofed animals evolved from condylarths, the idea that these creatures separated into single and cloven ungulates 50 million years ago is also a fairy tale. For example, some ungulates are presented as support for the supposed evolution of horses, and without producing any series of fossils, evolutionists claim that these animals suddenly appeared and suddenly disappeared. An evolutionist by the name of Boyce Rensberger, in a conference in Chicago"s Museum of Natural History in 1980, said the following:

The popularly told example of horse evolution, suggesting a gradual sequence of changes from four-toed fox-sized creatures living nearly 50 million years ago to today"s much larger one-toed horse, has long been known to be wrong. Instead of gradual change, fossils of each intermediate species appear fully distinct, persist unchanged, and then become extinct. Transitional forms are unknown. (Boyce Rensberger, Houston Chronicle, November 5, 1980, p. 15)

It can be easily seen that Animal Planet tells this tale because it is at a loss to explain the origins of ungulates. Animal Planet has a lot to say about the claims for the evolution of ungulates: "Condylarths, like modern ungulates, were animals that walked in their tow nails. Modern ungulates are evolved condylarths."

It can be seen that, although evolution is talked about here, there is not the least explanation of how it happens. There is no cause-effect relation between the two sentences and so there is no reasonable explanation. To say this is like saying that "a bicycle moves on tires like a car, that is because cars evolved form bicycles.

In short, Animal Planet is completely at a loss to explain the origins of ungulates and the basic purpose of all its fanciful stories is to make propaganda for the Darwinism it blindly accepts.


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.