Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

97, 62, 158, 49, 45 / 2009-06-25

Darwinists have once again begun raising claims that have already been answered in order to deny the enormous rout suffered by their dino-bird claims. They have been in a terrible panic, especially in recent days when evolution is going through its death throes, and have set about looking for a series of new methods of deception for the sake of propping Darwinism up. The latest instance of these concern a dinosaur fossil discovered in China and that has recently been reported in certain sections of the press. Darwinists are repeating the same hollow myths and reiterating the error that the fossil in question supposedly represents evidence for evolution.

Statements regarding the invalidity of the claim in question are as follows:

The fossil, known as Limusaurus inextricabilis, has short arms and three-toed claws. Darwinist paleontologists, who maintain that the fossil also has a small finger protrusion, are trying to herald this as a fourth finger and, as always, to use this characteristic as a tool of Darwinist propaganda. They claim that although “for some reason” this life form HAD NO FEATHERS (which could not possibly have existed anyway), because of this 1 cm bone in question it constitutes a potential transition from 5-toed dinosaurs to 3-toed birds.

But this is a classic Darwinist deception.

As we have already made clear in many other instances, Darwinists are experts when it comes to inventing speculation about different structures in a fossil. They use an anatomical imperfection, a broken bone or even a perfect organ in a fossilized life form as propaganda tools for Darwinist accounts. It will be useful to recall the Darwinist speculation about the Coelacanth as perhaps the most striking example of this. All the conjecture about the fossil was totally demolished as a result of the capture of a great many living Coelacanths. Darwinists chose to retreat into a profound silence in the face of this humiliation, as with all Darwinist deceptions that are proved to be frauds. (You can access detailed information about the Coelacanth here.)

Darwinists are now provocatively attempting to use a single bone protrusion in a dinosaur fossil of which we can never examine living specimens as a vehicle for Darwinist propaganda. The fact is, however, that Limusaurus inextricabilis is a flawless terrestrial life form with a perfect anatomy. It exhibits no transitional form characteristics. All its limbs and structures are flawless. As we have many times made clear, if Darwinists want to produce intermediate fossil evidence, then the life forms they produce must be similar to these:  


As living things turned, according to Darwinism, into ever more imaginary forms, anatomical abnormalities must have arisen. There must have been billions of such monstrous life forms, and we should keep digging up their fossil remains everywhere. But since these do not exist, Darwinists despairingly take a bone in a fossil, reshape it and call it transitional fossil. Yet the fossils they propose all belong to perfect, immaculate and flawless life forms.

As we have also clarified before, there is no question of a transition between terrestrial life forms and birds. The anatomic structures of terrestrial life forms and birds are completely different and any change in this perfect anatomical harmony can only prove fatal. The claim regarding the origin of birds that Darwinists have been making for so many years has had new frauds added onto it in the example of Limusaurus inextricabilis. Darwinists have fantastically attempted to equate the fossil with a bird, decided that the dinosaur should have feathers and then resorted to new tactics when no such thing was encountered in the fossil in question. When no feathers were found, they had no compunction about using such expressions as “the dinosaur’s body MAY HAVE BEEN covered in feathers.” The aim here is to launch a dinosaur that lived millions of years in the past as a transitional fossil using speculation and sophistry. (It also needs to be made clear at this point that the idea of the “feathered dinosaur” that Darwinists have brought up so many times before is totally fantastical. It has been shown that the structures described as feathers are completely different and that the fossils so heralded are false.)

The recent discovery of other findings that totally demolish all claims regarding the passage from dinosaurs to birds, the realization that dinosaurs had a totally different pelvic bone structure to that of birds, the bone being totally unsuited to flight, and that their totally different femur bones in particular made any such transition completely impossible utterly repudiate the Darwinist claim on the subject. In addition, this has been openly admitted by Darwinist scientists. This perfectly preserved fossil has been deliberately brought up in an attempt to neutralize this huge Darwinist collapse admitted even by Darwinists themselves and with the aim of making people to forget this defeat. The fact is, however, that Darwinist frauds just make Darwinists more ridiculous with every passing day. But Darwinists have a problem with admitting this fact.

The Limusaurus inextricabilis fraud has taken its place as yet another embarrassment in the history of Darwinism. Similar Darwinist falsehoods are still published in various popular publications by the Darwinist dictatorship that is unwilling to accept defeat. But through the works of Harun Yahya the global rout of Darwinism has been made plain for all to see. Allah created the universe and all the living things in it within a perfect harmony and brings each one into being separately. Allah shows, with His glorious works and evidence, that chance can play no role in the creation of life. Our advice to Darwinists is that they accept the fact of Creation, which is well known to everyone else, and stop making claims that have already been rebutted.



The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.