Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

Darwinists Are in Dismay!
Darwinists have concluded from the way orang utans produce the sound of laughter that these are the ancestors of human beings. Let us not provide other evidence, although this evidence may well depress Darwinists even further: If Darwinists are looking for similarities, orang utans’ teeth also resemble those of human beings. They also have two eyes and a nose in the front of their heads, just like human beings! They also have two ears and two arms. They eat and move. Just like human beings, they drink water and clean themselves. They have fingernails, just like human beings, and their hands resemble ours. And even more than all this, THEY ALSO MAKE LAUGHING SOUNDS.
Allah Has Created the World People Watch in a Space No Bigger Than a Lentil
The cover story of the 7 February, 2009, issue of New Scientist magazine appeared under the caption “Born Believers.” The article, which attempted to correlate belief in Allah (God) with the theory of evolution, which claimed that human beings possess the attribute of belief in Allah through a characteristic inherited from their supposed forebears, and that listed countless Darwinist accounts in order to back that claim up, in fact represented another despairing effort on the part of Darwinists, who have already been comprehensively defeated. The text, which soon received local press coverage as well, attempted to portray the predisposition to believe in Allah from birth as a result of natural selection and, furthermore, made the hollow and irrational claim, on the basis of these accounts, that it developed belief in Allah in the human brain. (Allah is beyond this)
Darwinists’ Greatest Embarrassment on the Agenda: Pointless Efforts to Keep the Myth of Whale Evolution Alive
On 4 February, 2009, New Scientist magazine carried an article titled “Primitive Whales Gave Birth on Land.” As a result of speculation about a 47-million-year-old whale fossil found in Pakistan, the fossil in question is claimed to represent the fictitious ancestor of whales and it is suggested that this confirms the Darwinist idea of the forebears of whales being terrestrial animals. The report was quickly covered by such Turkish news sites as CNNTurk.com, Milliyet and Sabah, and presented to readers with demagogic statements though with no accompanying scientific evidence. In the article in question, a female whale fossil and fetus discovered with it were used as vehicles for hasty speculation material by Darwinists, who sought to portray the fact the fossil was found on land as evidence for the “whales ancestors dwelled on dry land” deceit. It was also suggested that the head of the fetus had emerged from the whale, which died in giving birth, and this was also submitted as evidence for the same claim. But like all Darwinist speculation about whales, this is also based on a huge deception.
Virus Evolution Errors In New Scientist Magazine
In its 27 August, 2008, edition the magazine carried an article by Gary Hamilton containing speculation about the role of viruses in so-called evolution.
The Dinosaur Evolution Error in New Scientist
A report titled “Dinosaur evolutionary tree unveiled” appeared on the New Scientist.com web site on 23 July, 2008. Written by Colin Barras, the article dealt with a taxonomic study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.[i]
The myth of the evolution of the whale in New Scientist
A report published by the New Scientist news service on 19 December, 2007, outlined a description of a new fossil discovery claimed by evolutionists to represent the ancestor of the whale.
Facts about the Human Body of Which Darwinists Are Unaware
The supplement to the 31 August, 2007, edition of the Turkish magazine Cumhuriyet Bilim ve Teknik carried a report titled “The Human Body Is Filled with Evolution’s Worst Mistakes.” One of the worst errors in the report, written on the basis of the preconception that human beings evolved from primates, was the claim that humans were subjected to various flaws during the supposed process of evolution.
A Fossil That Refutes Theories of Human Evolution, and Darwinist Propaganda
An article titled "Earliest Primate Ancestor Had Surprisingly Tiny Brain" appeared on the Newscientist.com website on 31 May, 2007. Various other publications such as National Geographic and Science also carried the same report under a variety of other headings. It was reported that a newly discovered 29-million-year-old fossil by the name of Aegyptopithecus zeuxis had a rather small brain, contrary to all Darwinist expectations.
The Error of ""Evolutionary Change in Galapagos Finches""
New Scientist magazine carried an article headed ?Evolution in action by Darwin?s finches? in its 22 July, 2006, issue. The article concerned various observations made during the drought that affected the Galapagos Islands in 2003 and 2004 by the researchers Peter and Rosemary Grant, known for their studies of the island?s finches. The drought-related reduction in the seeds that represent the finches? food resulted in changes in the size of the beaks of the finch species Geospiza fortis and Geospiza magnirostris.
Evolutionsts ""Masks Lifted"" The fact that reconstructions do not reflect the truth has once again been proven
The 2 June, 2006, edition of New Scientist magazine carried an article by Deborah MacKenzie titled "Putting a face to a skull." The article discussed the unreliability of skull-based reconstructions. Based on an investigation by German police, the article once again revealed the scientific invalidity of the "reconstructions" -that represent a significant part of evolutionist propaganda concerning the fictitious human evolution.
1 2 3 4


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.