Books that demolish the theory of evolution

Documentaries that demolish the theory of evolution

Websites about the collapse of the theory of evolution

Books on the fact of creation

Documentaries on the fact of creation

Articles on the fact of creation

The logic that nothing, but chance, is scientific is a flawed one. It is a logical dead-end. If brand-new civilizations were discovered in outer space, would the logic of Darwinism and chance be employed in all of them? Would it be claimed that chance established civilizations everywhere? The portrayal of this miserable logic as scientific is the shame and disgrace of the current century.

Vol I:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol II:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol III:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)
Vol IV:
Acrobat (pdf)
MS Word (rtf)

Why is National Geographic magazine so unhappy at the exposure of Ardi?
The Turkish edition of National Geographic magazine devoted its July 2010 issue to Ardi, one of Darwinists’ great disappointments. Although the whole world now knows that Ardi is a fraud National Geographic’s endeavors on behalf of evolution have of course led to various points regarding that fraud to be raised once again:
Darwinists" Latest Desperate Efforts to Keep the Dino-Bird Deception Alive
Darwinists have once again begun raising claims that have already been answered in order to deny the enormous rout suffered by their dino-bird claims. They have been in a terrible panic, especially in recent days when evolution is going through its death throes, and have set about looking for a series of new methods of deception for the sake of propping Darwinism up. The latest instance of these concern a dinosaur fossil discovered in China and that has recently been reported in certain sections of the press. Darwinists are repeating the same hollow myths and reiterating the error that the fossil in question supposedly represents evidence for evolution.
Darwinists Are in Dismay!
Darwinists have concluded from the way orang utans produce the sound of laughter that these are the ancestors of human beings. Let us not provide other evidence, although this evidence may well depress Darwinists even further: If Darwinists are looking for similarities, orang utans’ teeth also resemble those of human beings. They also have two eyes and a nose in the front of their heads, just like human beings! They also have two ears and two arms. They eat and move. Just like human beings, they drink water and clean themselves. They have fingernails, just like human beings, and their hands resemble ours. And even more than all this, THEY ALSO MAKE LAUGHING SOUNDS.
An 84-Million-Year-Old Seal Skull That Demolishes the “Ancestor of the Seal” Deception
A brand new subject reported on 22 April, 2009, in Nature magazine, and reprinted thereafter in publishing organs such as Associated Press, Reuters, BBC news and National Geographic News, as well as on Turkish web sites such as Radikal and Haber Türk, was the claim that “the supposed terrestrial ancestor of the seal has been discovered.” A fossil belonging to an extinct land-dwelling animal was once again made the tool of Darwinist speculation and a scenario regarding the fossil based on extensive use of the imagination resulted. This land-dweller, given the name of “Puijila Darwin” and possessed of four legs and a tail, was described as a transitional form “swimming with four feet” and “with a tail serving no purpose” in order to fit in with the Darwinist scenario. The scientific evidence that refutes this huge deception may be set out as follows:
A New Convergent Evolution Lie: The Scenarios Dreamed up around Pseudotribos robustus
A report published in the 1 November, 2007, edition of Nature magazine and on the National Geographic web site on 31 October, 2007, raised another question regarding which Darwinists find themselves in an impossible position – the facts that different life forms have had similar structures for millions of years
A Fossil That Refutes Theories of Human Evolution, and Darwinist Propaganda
An article titled "Earliest Primate Ancestor Had Surprisingly Tiny Brain" appeared on the Newscientist.com website on 31 May, 2007. Various other publications such as National Geographic and Science also carried the same report under a variety of other headings. It was reported that a newly discovered 29-million-year-old fossil by the name of Aegyptopithecus zeuxis had a rather small brain, contrary to all Darwinist expectations.
National Geographic"s Darwin Error
The November edition of National Geographic magazine (NG) posed the question "Was Darwin Wrong?" on its front cover. Natural scientist David Quammen, author of the article by the same name, replied "No" to that question from his own perspective, and claimed that Darwin"s theory of evolution was today backed up by powerful scientific evidence. Quammen repeated the main claims from Darwin"s book The Origin of Species, but overlooked one important detail.
Animal Planet, ""Champions of the Wild""
In that section describing the manatee, a mammal also known as the southern fur seal, a number of evolutionist claims were made about the animal. The first such claim was that elephants and anteaters are among manatees" closest living relatives. This claim of a familial relationship is based solely on prejudice.
National Geographic ""Snakebite!""
As in all its earlier programs about snakes, National Geographic again claimed that snake venom is the product of evolution. There is no scientific evidence whatsoever for these claims. Moreover, the complicated chemistry of snake venom, the fangs which inject it and the channels it passes through are all complex designs which cannot be accounted for by evolution.
The (Expected) Fall Of The Microraptor Gui
The National Geographic published a short article by Christopher P. Sloan titled ‘the lord of wings’ in its May 2003 issue. Its subject was the discovery of the 130 million years old Microraptor gui fossils announced to the world in January 2003. At that time it was claimed that the fossil belonged to a four winged dinosaur, which was supposed to be gliding from tree to tree. This find was interpreted as evidence for the theory of birds having evolved from dinosaurs.
1 2


The way that all of Europe has become acquainted with Atlas of Creation and the declaration of the fact that living creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years and that evolution is devoid of any scientific worth have led to a major change of belief among the people of Europe. Independent polls conducted by well-known publishing institutions in different European countries have revealed a major drop in the numbers of people believing in Darwinism and that belief in Allah now dominates Europe. >>

In order to create, God has no need to design

It's important that the word "design" be properly understood. That God has created a flawless design does not mean that He first made a plan and then followed it. God, the Lord of the Earth and the heavens, needs no "designs" in order to create. God is exalted above all such deficiencies. His planning and creation take place at the same instant.
Whenever God wills a thing to come about, it is enough for Him just to say, "Be!"
As verses of the Qur'an tell us:
His command when He desires a thing is just to say to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 36: 82)
[God is] the Originator of the heavens and Earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, "Be!" and it is. (Qur'an, 2: 117)

Home | Books | Documentaries | Articles | Audio | Contact us | Subscribe

2007 Darwinism-Watch.com
Our materials may be copied, printed and distributed, by referring to this site.