As we all know, the world has been held captive by atheist masons and atheist Zionists’ wide-ranging and organized plans and Darwinist propaganda for the last century and a half. Through this comprehensive propaganda, institutions of state had to defend the heretical theory of evolution, schools had to teach it and teachers had to instruct their students in it, despite not believing it themselves. So shamelessly has this propaganda been disseminated that despite the theory of evolution being an astonishingly false and irrational lie, some people have been put in the willing or unwilling position of vigorously espousing this primitive thesis.

Darwinists never anticipated certain developments in the 21st century. They never imagined this unintelligent theory, devoid of any scientific or logical basis, would be so easily defeated. In deciding to raise new generations with this theory, they never even dreamed THAT THE NEW GENERATION WOULD MAKE FUN OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION. They never even ADMITTED THE POSSIBILITY that when the whole world had submitted to this unbelievable theory SOMEONE WITH THE COURAGE TO ANNIHILATE THE THEORY WOULD EMERGE. But everything they never imagined has come true.

The Turkish edition of National Geographic magazine devoted its July 2010 issue to Ardi, one of Darwinists’ great disappointments. Although the whole world now knows that Ardi is a fraud National Geographic’s endeavors on behalf of evolution have of course led to various points regarding that fraud to be raised once again:

Rather than putting an ape skull on the cover, together with a banner headline reading “A 4-million year-old woman,” National Geographic’s writers should concentrate on the fact that such methods no longer have any validity. When they look more carefully they will see that they can no longer convince anyone of the nonsense that is evolution.

Many aspects of the Darwinist deception regarding Tiktaalik Roseae, for long years the subject of speculation by Darwinists, have been exposed. Darwinist fraud, which we have maintained on the agenda so many times, has once again been revealed with new aspects. It has again been seen that people are being misled by Darwinists; TIKTAALIK ROSEAE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SPECIES OF ALLIGATOR:

Not even a single protein inside the cell can form spontaneously and by chance, let alone entire genes. There have to be other proteins and the cell itself in order for a protein to form. Yet genes are far more complex than proteins. There have to be both proteins and also all the organelles inside the cell in order for genes to exist. For that reason, for Darwinists who are unable to account for a single protein to engage in speculation and tell tall tales regarding genes could only possibly deceive children. Though not even children today believe in such fraud. 

Further evidence of the hopeless position in which Darwinists find themselves

Darwinists fear science. They are terrified that the truths revealed by science will be realized, known and spread across the world. The reason for this is that everything about science has demolished and invalidated the theory of evolution.  

The theory of evolution maintains, on the basis of no scientific foundation whatsoever, that at a time when there was still no life on Earth, inanimate substances came together to give rise to the first living organism. According to this evolutionist claim, the first living organism must have had a sufficiently simple structure to have been able to form by chance.

For years, Darwinists claimed that apes were the supposed ancestors of man and that these were divided into various categories depending on their developmental characteristics. By establishing imaginary sequences such as Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Neanderthal and Homo sapiens they attempted to give the impression that man gradually tried to walk upright, that his brain and abilities developed gradually and that he became more human as he left his ape-like characteristics behind. For years they strove to deceive people using imaginary pictures and reconstructions.

But like all deceptions, this has also come to an end. Recent statements about the Neanderthals in particular have made it essential to set out once more the following evidence regarding this human race that lived 200,000 years in the past and finally became extinct 60,000 years ago:

  Mycoplasma Mycoides

The faithful duplication and repair exhibited by the double-stranded DNA structure would seem to be incompatible with the process of evolution. Thus, evolution has been explained by the occurrence of "errors" during DNA replication and repair.

...Origin-of-life researchers cannot identify any location on primordial Earth suitable for production of prebiotic molecules. Those studying the problems cannot explain how the uniform “handedness” (homochirality) of amino acids, nucleotides, and sugars could emerge in any so-called prebiotic soup.

We recently discussed a fictitious transitional form fossil that has hit the headlines in Darwinist publications. Readers will recall how all Darwinist publications across the world published detailed pictures concerning this fossil, before the life form involved had even been announced, before the discovered parts had been shown to the public and before any information about it had been provided. They probably thought that propaganda before the fossil was unveiled would create excitement and arouse curiosity, or else would be more credible. Our reply to these false claims set out how the idea in question was mere speculation and that we would provide a more detailed response once detail concerning the discovery was available. There follows statements about the fossil published in Science magazine following wide-ranging conjecture and the invalidity of the Darwinist claims on the subject.

Before moving on to these statements, we need to remind ourselves of the truly important fact about Darwinism, which is that Darwinists are unable to account for the formation of even a single protein. Every time that Darwinists appear on TV programs or make statements to the press about a fragment of bone, we need to remember that they have no explanation even for how a single protein came into being or for the beginning of life. As we have already made clear, the existence of one protein is essential in order for another protein to form, and this is a greatest evidence that all the speculation in the name of evolution is false. Evolution has vanished right at the beginning of life, in the face of its smallest building block.

Darwinists employed the same technique they used with Australopithecus for the Neanderthals, an extinct human race. Neanderthal Man entered the scientific literature with the discovery in 1856 of fossils in the Neander Valley near the German city of Düsseldorf. The curvatures in its skull and bones led it being regarded by evolutionists as a supposed primitive human species. In 1908 an almost complete skeleton described as belonging to Neanderthal Man was found in the French region of La Chapelle-aux-Saints. The bones re re-assembled by the famous paleontologist and geologist of the time Marcellin Boule. The Neanderthal Man that emerged from this re-assembly had a stooped posture and a protruding skull. Its legs were also locked at the joints, meaning it lacked a fully upright posture. Thanks to this appearance, the impression formed in people’s minds that Neanderthal Man was a primitive being. Neanderthals were also depicted as ape-men in fictitious illustrations. This false impression of the Neanderthals lasted for 100 years. But analysis of the La Chapelle skeleton in the 1950s determined that the Neanderthal to whom it belonged had a kind of joint infection. Healthy individuals were in fact able to walk just like normal human beings. In 1985 the same skeleton was examined by the anthropologist Erik Trinkhaus. That examination confirmed that Neanderthals walked upright and revealed another fact that had hitherto remained hidden:  Marcellin Boule had deliberately portrayed Neanderthal as being stooped. 1 The joint disorder identified in the 1950s was no obstacle to the individual walking upright. It appeared that the Darwinist Boule was unwilling to admit that the Neanderthal walked like a normal human being.  E. Trinkaus and W. W. Howells made the following statement in Scientific American magazine:

Meanwhile, the size of the Neanderthal skull also forced evolutionists into inconsistency.  The reason was that Neanderthals had a skull volume of around 1700 cc. This is 200cc more of the volume of today’s human beings’. The fact that Neanderthals, supposedly a “primitive” species, had a greater brain volume than Homo sapiens represented a huge contradiction for the theory of evolution.  The Neanderthal expert Erik Trinkhaus admits:

Darwinist publications recently and again collectively carried headline pictures of a very interesting-looking life form. This odd creature in the imaginary picture below was heralded to the entire world as a “third species.” The newspapers produced striking captions to support Darwinist claims such as “An unknown hominin!” “A great discovery, neither Neanderthal nor Homo sapiens” and “A Development That Will Re-write the History of Humanity...” Then under these they placed the following picture:

The only source of this picture and the shock propaganda surrounding it WAS A SINGLE FOSSIL FINGER BONE. Darwinists, who previously produced images of the imaginary Nebraska Man, based on a single pig tooth, together with his family and in a social environment, and who claimed that this shed great light on the supposed evolution of man, have now gone so far in 2010, when the collapse of Darwinism has now been openly declared, as to produce a whole life story on the basis of a young child’s pinky finger, and even to herald it as a third species.

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya)

A 165-million-year-old fossil spider discovered in the Daohugou region of Northern China is one of the oldest fossil spider specimens found to date. Another noteworthy characteristic of this fossil is that, as can be seen in the picture, it is perfectly preserved. Paul Selden, a paleontologist from the University of Kansas, says, “The level of detail preserved in the fossils is amazing.” (Archeology Daily News)

As shown in the picture, this spider that lived 165 million years ago possessed all the features of those living today. Having remained unchanged for millions of years, spiders represent a huge dead-end for the theory of evolution. Spiders always appear with the same characteristics in the fossil record, and are one of the proofs that living things never evolved. The spider in the picture below is 165 million years old, and there is no difference between it and present-day spiders. 

There has been great excitement in the Darwinist media in recent days. Darwinists discovered a new tool for speculation and rushed to pontificate about it with a single voice. A tactic dating back 150 years was employed. Certain Darwinist publications were in unanimous agreement. The aim was to use the discovery of a footprint to defend the same false scenario as much as possible and to bring the evolution deceit that has gone on for so many years back to life in its final days. The subject of the speculation in question was footprints discovered in Poland belonging to a life form thought to date back 395 million years. In order to cover up their defeat, Darwinists claimed that these perfect prints belonged to “the first life form to move from water to dry land.” 

A report that recently appeared on various web sites such as the BBC, Science, Scientific American, Discover and CBS claimed that “inanimate prions evolved.”  This utterly illogical claim was portrayed as a major scientific discovery in the reports in question, and statements liberally adorned with scientific terminology were laid out one after the other just as they were established fact. As always, the aim was to deceive the majority of people with no knowledge of what prions actually are, using confusing language and accounts.

The subject of the origin of life is a declaration of the most comprehensive and fundamental Darwinist collapse. At the same time, since the subject represents the greatest evidence of the Darwinist defeat, it is one that Darwinists are quite helpless in the face of. They have long been looking for a way of overcoming this hopeless situation, at least in their own eyes. Those Darwinists who have for years claimed that viruses evolved, something that has repeatedly been disproved, are now trying to use “prions,” inanimate structures far smaller than viruses, as evidence for their false theories. The invalidity of this claim can be summarized as follows:

Darwinists can write as many deceptive books jam packed with formulae, produce as many false fossils as they like, make as many demagogic assaults on the scientific evidence for Creation as they choose or stick posters up full of fantastical illustrations and present these as exhibitions of evolution all over the place, but none of this will ever change the fact of their fundamental defeat. Because the worst nightmare for Darwinists is the very beginning of life. Darwinists HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE A SINGLE EXPLANATION of how just one protein came into being. This is an expression of the despairing situation into which, Dawkins, Futuyma, Tim White and all other Darwinists now find themselves. None of this demagoguery can resolve this great and stupendous rout in the face of a single protein. A SINGLE PROTEIN HAS TOTALLY DEMOLISHED DARWINISM.

One important feature of Darwinist demagoguery is that Darwinists always tended to reduce the question of the origin of life to the very simple, despite all the complexity of life, by portraying everything within it as very simple. That is the reason for such myths as “the cell emerged from muddy water” and “DNA spontaneously began replicating itself.” Darwinists imagined it would be easier to deceive people in this way. But they have now seen that the time for such deception has passed. Not only do people now know that a single protein is far too complex ever to come into being spontaneously, they are also aware that neither a protein, DNA, RNA or any other minute component of the cell WILL SERVE ANY PURPOSE IN THE ABSENCE OF THE CELL AS A WHOLE.

“Badi”, is one of the names of Almighty Allah. It means “HE WHO CREATES UNIQUE AND ASTONISHING WORLDS.”  

Darwinists have had to keep apologizing for the last 150 years; “sorry, that was a hoax,” they said, “our mistake, it was a pig tooth, not a human one,” they said, “sorry about that, the moths were deliberately stuck onto the trees,” “the skull had been planed down,” “feathers had been stuck onto the dinosaur by hand,” “it appears that this fossil is still alive and not an intermediate form at all,” and “the primordial atmosphere was not like that at all,” they said. “Embryos are not like this at all, the illustrations are fakes,” they said. “We said it was the ancestor of man, but it appears it was just an ordinary ape,” they said. They have kept on apologizing and retracting their claims. They have hurriedly withdrawn fossils from museums. Declaring something to be an intermediate fossil in one issue of a journal, they have issued an apology in the subsequent edition. And this has carried on right down to the present day. 

The reason is this: DARWINISM IS SIMPLY A DEVIANT IDEOLOGY, WITH NOTHING SCIENTIFIC ABOUT IT. IT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY EVEN A SINGLE PIECE OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. It is for that reason that Darwinists constantly manufacture false evidence. But their frauds are only short-lived.

With his faked embryo drawings, Ernst Haeckel deceived the world of science for a century

In 1879, two well-known evolutionists of the time went even further in their activities intended to constitute evidence for the fictitious evolution of the horse scenario and set up the equine series that Darwinists would maintain on the agenda for many years to come. The American fossil researcher Othniel Charles Marsh and Thomas Huxley (known as Darwin’s bulldog) established a series by setting out various hoofed fossils on the number of nails on the front and rear feet and the structure of their teeth. One small mammal fossil previously named Hyracotherium by Sir Richard Owen in 1841 was renamed in such a way as to echo evolution, being given the name Eohippus, meaning “Dawn Horse.” The pair published their claims and diagrams in the American Journal of Science, thus laying the foundations of the horse series laid out from Eohippus to the present day in museums and text books as supposed evidence of evolution. The main stages in this fictitious series were Eohippus, Orohippus, Miohippus, Hipparion and the present-day Equus.

This fictitious series was portrayed as the greatest supposed evidence for the evolution of the horse for the following century. The decrease in the number of toes and the regular increase in size, from smaller to larger, was enough to convince evolutionists. 

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya)

Unable to deny the existence of 250 million fossils proving the existence of Creation, to explain even how a single protein came into existence or how life initially began, to give an example about a beneficial mutation, and seeing the glory of the fact of Creation, Richard Dawkins established a space cult for himself in an effort to cope with the profound dilemma he faced! Richard Dawkins was urged to admit the irrationality of his claims of “chance” and realized that Darwinism is in a great dilemma. Unable to resolve these issues and find a way out, he had to admit that all beings were created. However, because he found it difficult to withdraw all his claims all of a sudden, he considers aliens as deities. (Surely Allah is beyond that) Surely even this is enough to see that Dawkins had to abandon his claims of "chance" and is no longer a Darwinist. Now it remains for Dawkins to answer the following question: Who created the aliens? Dawkins will probably give the right answer also to this question, because after admitting that beings are created and seeing the falsity of Darwinism, it is impossible for a person to deny that all the glorious Creation in the universe belongs to Allah. Indeed, in one of his interviews Dawkins confesses that life was created somewhere in the space by a SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE. 1

The Timesonline web site set the connection between Darwinism and the killings in question out on 8 November, 2009, while in Turkey daily Haberturk also covered the story on 9 November, 2009, under the caption “High School Killings down to Darwin.” The fact is, however, that the massacres in question took place at various intervals over the previous 10 years. Furthermore, the young people doing the shooting in all these massacres announced that they were doing so because of Darwinism. Each one believed, as a requirement of Darwinist ideology, that the weak needed to be eliminated and destroyed. Because they regarded their friends and teachers as animals, it was not hard to slaughter them with that mindset. On the contrary, they thought that killing these people would contribute to society and the future.

This is a well known characteristic of Darwinists. Since they are well aware that they will be defeated in the face of the evidence, they take care great care to avoid it. Richard Dawkins, the Darwinist and atheist, has done the same thing. Dawkins has refused the challenge of a face-to-face debate, reiterated by Adnan Oktar many times and even publicized in an announcement in THE TIMES, one of Britain’s highest circulation dailies, with the words “I DO NOT DEBATE WITH CREATIONISTS.” Dawkins has no hesitation about debating with secondary school students or priests, but FOR SOME REASON REFUSES TO DEBATE WHEN THE SUBJECT IS ONE OF THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. 

Darwinopterus

Great Britain, Darwin’s own homeland, now rejects evolution. For years the bastion of Darwinism, Britain has come to oppose evolution extraordinarily quickly over the past few years. The country heads the list of those in which the fact of creation is spreading the quickest, and the public, as recent newspaper headlines show, now want students to learn about the fact of creation in schools.

Richard Dawkins, who has recently stepped up his pro-Darwinist and atheist activities in Britain, imagined that Darwinism, the worst deception in the world, would be strengthened with atheist camps and demagoguery. Dawkins has been engaged in wide-ranging activities to that end for many years now, and has expressed his concern at the spread of Creationist belief, and has set these fears out in his latest book in such a clear manner that they cannot be denied. Rather than providing any scientific evidence to support his claims, Dawkins makes far from scientific accusations, writes slogans on the sides of public buses, seeks to attract interest by performing impersonations on talk shows and most recently sought shelter behind the idea of aliens. He truly imagined that these false and demagogic methods would work. His latest book, in which he claims to “provide evidence for evolution,” actually contains not a single piece of scientific evidence, only demagoguery, but he actually thinks that this outdated method going back 150 years can still influence people today. 

Tree bark in the mid-19th century during the early part of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain was light in color. For that reason, dark colored variants of the moth species (melanic moths) Biston betularia could easily be seen and caught by birds. Fifty years later, however, lichens, a kind of algae had died around the trees as a result of industrial pollution, and the trees had become darker in color. This time, it was now lighter colored moths that were more visible on the trees and that were caught more often by birds. As a result, the number of light colored moths declined, while the darker melanic moths increased in number, since these were less easily caught.

Evolutionists eagerly seized on this state of affairs as significant evidence for their claims of evolution by way of natural selection. Using the same deceptive techniques as always they set about trying to mislead people into thinking that light moths evolved into darker ones. This claim was heralded to the words as “evolution in action.” But the facts were very different, since these moths in fact underwent no evolutionary change at all, the only thing present being a huge Darwinist deception.     

It will be recalled that Darwinists tried to publicize the fossil named Ida as the so-called ancestor of human beings in May 2009. We had announced a declaration right away and ended speculations by clarifying that this fossil that is presented to be the so-called ancestor of human beings through wide speculation of mainstream media did in fact belong to a lemur. You may read our statements on Ida, the lemur fossil, here and also here. As a result, the “Ida show”put on play by some Darwinist circles had immediately come to an end. As a matter of fact, anyone having a perspective of true science would instantly see that Ida is a perfect living being with consummate existence for 47 million years unlike the speculations. This fossil preserved in 95% intact form with almost all details present for investigation contained NOT EVEN ONE STRUCTURE WHICH SHOWS ANY INTERMEDIARY FEATURE. This extraordinary finding IS AN EVIDENCE FOR FACT OF CREATION.

Darwinists have recently been exhibiting a state of great awe. They believe that foreign journals are miraculous. They literally regard these journals as sacred, and regard everything published in them as equally sacred. Since they hold such a belief they imagine that everything published in them will have a stunning impact. The way they are so impressed with all things foreign and their inferiority complex that stems from their inability to defend the theory of evolution scientifically forces them to issue such statements.

This admiration for all things foreign has reached such a dimension that proponents of evolution in Turkey in particular refuse to accept scientific evidence as such unless it is published in these journals they so admire. They oppose all kinds of scientific fact by saying, “If a paper has been published in a foreign journal it is true, and if not, it is wrong.” They still reject such papers if they are collected together in book form. In their eyes, in order for an article to be accurate and scientific it has to be published in a journal of some 50 pages measuring 27x20 cm, on wood-containing paper and lavishly illustrated with pictures of Darwin on the cover. But if the papers are collected together in book form, they will still regard them as unacceptable, no matter what scientific evidence they contain.

As with All Their Transitional Fossil Tales, Darwinists Are Deceiving People with Regard to ARDI:

As we have already made clear many times before, Darwinists use the following technique when it comes to the fictitious evolution of man: they take an extinct gorilla or chimpanzee. That is easy for Darwinists because only 120 OUT OF THE 6000 APE SPECIES THAT ONCE EXISTED ARE STILL ALIVE TODAY. In other words, the fossil remains from 5880 ape species are perfect tools for Darwinist speculation. Darwinists generally invent highly primitive scenarios using these fossils, making claims such as “all right, it is a monkey, but its thumb is bent and the soles of its feet are curved, meaning it is turning into a human being.” The scenario is totally illogical, but these illogical accounts may appear quite convincing to people with no knowledge of the subject when published in world famous Darwinist publications, when adorned with scientific terminology nobody can comprehend, and when those who espouse them are professors blindly devoted to Darwinism, in other words, when a lie is repeated over and over again. Darwinists thus take advantage of people’s lack of knowledge, the influence of the media and propaganda techniques, and have been engaged in this base strategy for many years now.

Anchiornis Huxleyi Is Not a Transitional Fossil But a Species of Bird Like Those Living Today

Despite all the Darwinist speculation, it appears from even a brief examination of the Anchiornis Huxleyi fossil that it represents a species of bird similar to those living today. The fossil in question exhibits fully avian features in terms of skull and general anatomy. In terms of its wings and feathers, it appears to resemble the today’s species of birds with muffed feet. In addition to wings, these animals have feathers strongly reminiscent of wings on their back legs. The feathers in question do not function as wings, but are important in giving the animal an impressive appearance.  

Certain publications in Turkey have recently been reporting statements directed at the Atlas of Creation at a conference given by Richard Dawkins a year ago as if they were something new. 

Dawkins Has Suffered a Huge Defeat, and That Is the Reason for His Refusal to Meet Mr. Adnan Oktar:  

Whether or not Darwinists admit it, all the fossils ever discovered lead to the same conclusion: LIVING THINGS ARE PERFECT, EMERGED MOMENTARILY AND WERE CREATED OUT OF NOTHING. THEY HAVE NEVER CHANGED, AND THERE ARE NO SUPPOSED TRANSTIONAL STAGES OF THE KIND CLAIMED BY EVOLUTIONISTS. IT IS OUR LORD ALLAH, LORD OF THE EARTH, THE SKY AND ALL THE WORLDS, WHO CREATES THEM FROM NOTHING.

It is Allah who created the seven heavens and of the earth the same number, the Command descending down through all of them, so that you might know that Allah has power over all things and that Allah encompasses all things in His knowledge. (Surat at-Talaq, 12)

Scientific American’s Admissions and “It Must Have Happened” Approach

The subject matter of “Life on Earth” consisted of demagogic evolutionist accounts regarding the question of how the first building blocks of life appeared. However, since the theory of evolution has no scientific explanations or evidence on the subject, the Darwinist authors here adopt a fantasy approach throughout the article, as in all other Darwinist publications.

The Independent newspaper took an important fossil discovery as its cover story on 9 September, 2009. Under the caption, “A skull that rewrites the history of man,” the report discussed fossil remains from more than one human being discovered in the Dmanisi region of Georgia. And due to their age and characteristics, these fossils totally repudiated Darwinist scenarios. Darwinists claim that Homo erectus, which they frequently employ as a tool in imaginary human evolution but which is in fact nothing other than today’s man, emerged in Africa 1.9 million years ago. The fossils discovered WERE 1.8 MILLION YEARS OLD AND FOUND IN EURASIA. This revealed that the myths of evolution taught in schools for so many years were “false.” Darwinists’ famous “MIGRATION OUT OF AFRICA: SCENARIO WAS ONCE AGAIN FRUSTRATED, JUST LIKE ALL OTHER EVOLUTIONIST SCENARIOS.   But this example is nothing new. Darwinists frequently take a step back with regard to the scenarios they dreamed up, saying, “Sorry, we made a mistake.” To be more accurate, they are forced to take a step back because they are quite unable to match their evolutionary scenarios to any scientific evidence. When genuine fossils that overturn scenarios based on fictitious scenarios emerge the only option for them is to modify their fantastical tale and announce it all over again. This happens so often that fictitious ancestors and fictitious dates change and life forms supposedly descended from one another turn out to have lived at the same time. The revelation of 250 million fossils that prove the fact of Creation inflicted terrible disappointment on Darwinists. These fossils eliminated each and every scenarios Darwinists had come up with in the name of evolution. Since they are unable to find an answer, all Darwinists are now able to do is to try to ignore these 250 million fossils and persist in their old ways in the hope that “people may still fall for them.” But what they forget is that the whole world has now seen these 250 million fossils and concluded that evolution is nonsense. Modifying their position in the light of new fossils clearly shows the extent to which the Darwinist deception can go. The fictitious equine series has changed more than 20 times for that very reason. Newly discovered fossils kept repudiating this false series and toe numbers, heights and dates totally contradicted one another, yet Darwinists kept coming up with a new evolution of the horse series, filled with nonsense every time, in order not to have to back down. This scenario IS A SOURCE OF SHAME FOR DARWINISM, as many Darwinists have openly admitted. But it is still an excellent example with regard to shedding light on the Darwinist deception. Most recently, a 45-million-year-old horse fossil totally demolished the theory. Because according to Darwinists, 50 million years ago the mythical ancestor of the horse should have been no bigger than a dog. In the wake of that rout, total silence prevailed, even among the most fanatical Darwinists.   

Parker says that Darwin made these claims out of a lack of scientific knowledge: 

"Darwin simply didn't have access to the information we have," explains Parker. "If Darwin had been aware of the species that have an appendix attached to a large cecum, and if he had known about the widespread nature of the appendix, he probably would not have thought of the appendix as a vestige of evolution."  

Fish belonging to this family, made up of 50 species, are able to travel short distances by using their fins as wings. Flying fish can leap 1.5-2.5 meters in the air. These creatures are living today, utterly perfect life forms and MARVELS OF CREATION. Their fossil remains dating back 100 million years have been discovered and the animals HAVE NEVER CHANGED over millions of years. Were these life forms extinct and were we to possess only their fossil remains, that those fossils would doubtless be depicted by Darwinists as a supposed intermediate form and would be heralded as the greatest evidence for evolution in the world’s most renowned publications.  But the fact they are still alive poses a total obstacle to all Darwinist speculation.

That deception is resorted to in all other extinct life forms described by Darwinists as intermediate forms, and flawless and perfect specimens find their way into evolutionist publications as intermediate forms.  

The Platypus is a mosaic life form. In other words, it has characteristics belonging to more than one species. Although it is a mammal, it lays eggs. It is covered in fur, has milk glands and suckles its young. Its mouth resembles a bird beak and, again like birds, it has webbed feet. It has venom and leaves its eggs to hatch in a burrow, like reptiles. Fossil remains of the creature dating back to the age of the dinosaurs have been found (208-146 million years ago). And it has never changed over the intervening years. Tiktaalik is also a mosaic life form, like the platypus, and all its characteristics show it to be a perfect life form. The only difference between it and the platypus is that Tiktaalik is extinct and thus liable for use as a tool for Darwinist speculation. If the platypus were also extinct and if its remains had been discovered by Darwinists, then in all probability it would have been heralded as a prominent intermediate form, just like Tiktaalik.

The fact is, however, that the platypus IS A FULLY FORMED AND FLAWLESS LIFE FORM that is still alive today and HAS NEVER CHANGED AT ALL OVER THE LAST 200 MILLION YEARS. 

The fact that it is Allah Who created the Big Bang and the entire universe and all of life does not (Allah is beyond that) stem from any lack of explanation or lack of finding an answer to what went before it. In that case, that would require an explanation only to what was before and that all life and the universe were random, yet there is no such randomness on Earth (surely Allah is beyond that). The whole universe and the living things in it point to one thing. Examination of them reveals something very extraordinary. The equilibrium in the universe, the order on Earth, life, a single cell in a living thing or even a single atom all speak of the extraordinary features they possess. They all speak of an intelligence. They say that this intelligence is far superior to anything you can see or know. They indicate a sublime Power that creates worlds within worlds and indicates intelligence and splendor even inside the atom. And that conclusion leads us to the existence of Almighty Allah.

There is no need to go back to the beginnings of the universe to see that. A single cell, a single hair or even a single atom, are sufficient to see the existence and greatness of Allah and thus to believe. Of course the creation of the universe through the Big Bang is a major event, by means of which Allah reveals His might and sublime power. The idea that “this is not part of science” is a nonsensical one. Science exists so we can investigate Allah’s creations. It enables us to see the greatness of the message they bear. It enables us to better comprehend the greatness and might of Allah.

Statements bordering on the downright insulting made by Mine G. K?r?kkanat and directed at people who espouse the fact of Creation, solely on the basis of the fact that their views differ from hers, on the program Sansürsüz, broadcast on the Turkish channel HaberTürk, were totally unbecoming.  If someone else one day directs comments of a similar nature toward Mine G. K?r?kkanat, calling her a “left-wing atheist militant” for instance, she would not be at all pleased. Why employ such terms when more urbane language is available?

The fact that Darwin was aware of Cambrian fossils and thought that the Cambrian period dated back 60 million years: -    Darwin imagined that the Cambrian period referred to a time some 60 million years before his day.  Stephen Jay Gould said that “Nothing distressed him [Darwin] more than the Cambrian explosion, the coincident appearance of almost all complex organic designs..." Darwin felt that distress over fossils that he imagined dated back only 60 million years. Had he known that they actually dated back 540 million years, he would probably have abandoned his theory entirely.   -    Examples can be cited of Cambrian fossils that were around in Darwin’s time. Because Cambrian fossils were first unearthed in Darwin’s day, and he was well aware of these. The presence of oxygen in the primordial atmosphere makes the chemical reactions that form the cell impossible: -    Oxygen in the primordial atmosphere will immediately oxidize and destroys the molecules that form. In addition, the reactions that form the compounds that existed before that cannot take place in the presence of oxygen. The reactions required for protein and DNA to form cannot take place in the presence of oxygen. (William Dembski and Jonathan Wells, How To Be An Intellectually Fullfilled Atheist (Or Not), 2008, p. 27) It is impossible for amino acids to inter-react in the primordial atmosphere: -    Under normal conditions, amino acids do not react with one another. But they immediately react with other substances, such as sugar.   -    If, as Darwinists claim, amino acids formed by chance on the primeval Earth, then they would not float around waiting to combine with the correct amino acids. Instead, they would enter into reactions with different compounds and become biologically unusable through being bonded to them. As a result, all there would be is a chemical soup.    The mutations described as neutral are in fact deleterious, but for various reasons Darwinists try to depict these mutations as beneficial: -    An article titled SILENT MUTATIONS SPEAK, published in Nature magazine on 21 December, 2006, showed that the 1% of mutations thought to have no effect at all did in fact have effects.   (http://www.nature.com/news/2006/061221/full/news061218-12.html) -    According to the research, neutral mutations (described as silent mutations) damage a protein by impacting on its two amino acids. The protein pump that expels proteins outside the cell is damaged.    -    Darwinists claim that treatment such as chemotherapy has a more rapid effect on the damaged part of the cell and that this is an example of useful mutation.  -    But the important thing here is that mutations described as neutral in fact damage proteins. In order to be useful they need to be able to bestow new structures on an organism. But that is impossible. -    This is like opening fire on someone. Ninety-nine out of 100 bullets shatter the body. One bullet may, however, have a healing effect by destroying an infection in the body. But the person concerned has in any case been blown to smithereens.

This was again clearly demonstrated on the program Sansursuz (Uncensored), broadcast on 14 August, 2009. The concept that panicked Darwinists was the “world inside our brains:”   The photon strikes the eye, and an electric signal goes from the eye to the brain. The electric signal departs from the eye and reaches an area the size of a lentil called the sight center. And an image then forms in that lentil-sized area. THERE IS AN EYE that looks at the image that forms there. IT IS “THAT” EYE THAT IS ACTUALLY PERFECT. That eye sees the electricity that reaches it. And with a perception of perfect depth, brightly, vividly, in movement, full color and in three dimensions. Yet that region is pitch black. The places the electric signals arrive at, the sight center, and the interior of the brain are all in darkness. Yet the eye there sees a perfect and crystal clear image, a far better one than that produced by any high-tech television. And it interprets these images in such a way as to feel sorrow, joy, love and liking, or to analyze, remember or learn from them. There is a miracle going on here.  Atoms that are unable to see cannot combine together, unconsciously and by chance, to produce a visual system that gives a better image then even the most perfect camera and that provides a sharper and more colorful image than those produced by the most highly advanced three-dimensional cinema or television systems. Unconscious atoms with no ability to hear anything cannot produce a hearing system, as the result of chance, that is far superior to that of the most advanced stereo system, with perfectly sharp and multi-dimensional sounds indistinguishable from the real thing. Atoms that cannot smell anything cannot produce a system of smell that detects the perfume of a rose under the influence of chance.  Unconscious atoms with no sense of hot, cold or hardness cannot produce a sense of touch as the result of chance. Unconscious atoms unaware of their own existence cannot turn by chance into human beings that enjoy music, know the tastes of all kinds of food, have memories, think and feel, that make plans, relive their memories in their minds, enjoy laughter and happy times and possess hundreds of other such characteristics, or even turn into scientists that investigate the structure of the atoms itself. The eye that sees the bright, mobile and three dimensional world on the outside in the brain IS THE SOUL. The soul is entirely metaphysical and cannot be explained through any material concept. For that reason, materialists, atheists and Darwinists who seek to account for the existence of the soul and everything else in terms of matter are in a state of utter panic. The soul bestowed on man by Almighty Allah totally demolishes Darwinism and every intellectual system espoused by Darwinists. That is why, as on the program in question, Darwinists are unwilling to discuss such issues and immediately try to gloss over them. One expects them to run away from the issue. Because they will always be defeated in the face of the perfection of the eye that sees inside our brains that Allah has created.