Recent Articles

netcevap

The invalidity of the famous Darwinist claim that “useful mutations do exist.”

The false idea that useful mutations exist is a classic Darwinist claim. Although the whole scientific world knows, with absolute scientific evidence, that mutations have a destructive or fatal effect, this claim is still persistently made, out of a fear of humiliation. Because Darwinism is a theory that depends totally on mutations. All Darwinists know that if the destructive effect …

Read More »

The invalidity of the claim that “the fossils known as transitional forms have been retracted because better ones have been found”

Darwinists admit that the fossils portrayed supposed transitional forms are eventually taken back and removed from the literature, but they justify this by claiming that “a better one has been found.”  The fossils brought to public view to great Darwinist fanfare in the last few years in particular show how comic this evolutionist claim really is . –      The evolution deception …

Read More »

The invalidity of the claim that “moral understanding exists from birth, you cannot ignore an actively existing concept”

Some Darwinists maintain that moral understanding is a pre-existing concept in living things, that they possess it from birth, and that there is therefore no need for belief in Allah in order to be ethical (surely Allah is beyond that). As proof of this, they cite examples of self-sacrifice in various living things. But the fact is they are gravely …

Read More »

The invalidity of the claim that “RNA is the forebear of life”

The RNA world thesis is a supposed savior launched by Darwinists out of a sense of despair at the failure of all experiments regarding the beginning of life. But everyone who understands science and the complexity of the cell will inevitably find it illogical for Darwinists, who have never manufactured even a single protein, to make such a claim. In …

Read More »